MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6989731733

Canadian College Student Finances.

2010· other· en· W6989731733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistic Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortWork (physics)Plan (archaeology)Statistical analysisHigher education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When asked what their main non-academic activity was in the same time period, over twothirds of students said that they were working, either full-time or part-time.As expected, students' ages influenced their main activity prior to enrolment: students in the 25-to 29-yearold cohort are most likely to report working.In age groups older than this cohort, a smaller proportion of students worked immediately before attending college.Students in Access and Upgrading programs were thus least likely to report having worked in the 12 months prior to enrolment.Post/Advanced Diploma students are most likely to have worked full-time, and University Preparation and Degree students are most likely to have worked part-time.Just over half of students (54%) plan to work after graduation, especially those obtaining a Post/Advanced Diploma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1630.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicLinguistic Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207