MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6989817454

Catalytic fast pyrolysis of beetle killed lodgepole pine in a novel ablative reactor

2018· dissertation· en· W6989817454 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrolysisCatalysisPinus contortaAblative caseMountain pine beetleFire investigation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere continue to rise, lignocellulosic biomass is further being investigated for their potential as a feedstock for alternative fuels. Beetle killed lodgepole pine (BKLP) is a lignocellulosic biomass that becomes hazardous from structural defects caused by an infection of the mountain pine beetle, prompting its need to be removed from the forest and repurposed. The fast pyrolysis of BKLP generates organic volatiles, and that condense producing a liquid oil (bio-oil). The bio-oil produced is incompatible with the current infrastructure because of its acidic, corrosive, and unstable nature associated to its high oxygen content. The high oxygen content also results in a low higher heating value as compared to gasoline. Here, we explore two different methods to target the production of aromatic hydrocarbons, which are gasoline additives. In the first method, we deposited palladium metal nanoparticles on the BKLP to produce more phenolic compounds that act as precursors to thetarget aromatic hydrocarbons. The second method involved adding a catalytic upgrade reactor downstream of an ablative reactor to upgrade organic volatiles into aromatic hydrocarbons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)→Same topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes→French-language works237,207→