MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6989871207

Characterization of orographic cloud and precipitation features over southern Baffin Island and surrounding area

2014· dissertation· en· W6989871207 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrographyOrographic liftPrecipitation typesPrecipitationSnowArcticStormClimate model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improved characterization of cloud and precipitation features are required to understand the impact of a changing climate in high latitude regions and accurately represent these features in models. The importance of cold season precipitation to regional moisture cycling and our limited understanding of orographic cloud and precipitation processes in the Arctic provide the motivation for this research. Using high-resolution datasets collected during the Storm Studies in the Arctic (STAR) field project this thesis examines cloud and precipitation features over southern Baffin Island in Nunavut. Cloud and precipitation features were shown to differ over orography compared to the adjacent ocean regions upstream. Gravity waves, terrain shape, atmospheric stability and atmosphere-ocean exchanges were all associated with precipitation enhancement. In addition, high sea ice extent, low-level blocking in the upstream environment and sublimation were factors that reduced precipitation. The nature of hydrometeors was variable and accretion and aggregation were found to be important determinants of whether precipitation reached the ground. The processes controlling a snowfall event over southern Baffin Island were found to be complex, representing a significant challenge for modelling in the region. Low-level convection over adjacent ocean regions, strong upslope flow over the terrain, and the passing of a weak trough collectively produced the event. Analysis of the Global Environmental Multi-scale limited area model (GEM-LAM 2.5) revealed that upstream convection and upslope processes were affected by model errors. Consequently, precipitation onset was delayed and total modelled accumulation was 50% less than observations. Further evaluation of a numerical weather prediction model during STAR cases provided descriptions of model errors and proficiencies for different synoptic forcing and surface environments. Overall the model overestimated temperature and had difficulties representing thermal inversions over sea ice. The model generally over-predicted moisture with the exception of profiles over sea ice and land. Wind speed was frequently underestimated, weakening upslope processes and errors in wind direction were large at times. Cloud-tops were usually too high and cloud-bases too low. Where multiple cloud layers were present, the dry layer depth was inaccurate. Model errors were shown to have implications for cloud and precipitation production and their forecast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→