Bibliographic record
Abstract
To provide for the Sale of the Clergy Reserves in the Province of Upper Canada, and for the Distribution of the Proceeds thereof.N. B. -The Clause markel (A.) was added by the Committee.ty<t%(££l& it is expedient to provide for the final dispo-Preamble: sition of the Lands called Clergy Reserves, in Upper Canada, and for the appropriation of the yearly Income arising or to arise therefrom, for the maintenance of Religion, and the 5 advancement of Christian Knowledge within the said Province; 3<t it CnacteO, by The QUEEN's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, THAT after the passing of this Act, it cienjy Re- 10 shall be lawful for the Governor of the Province of Canada, or for Jjy ma?1,e the Lieutenant-Governor of Upper Canada, by and with the ad- vice of his Executive Council, and under such regulations as may be by him from time to time in Council established in that behalf, and approved by The Queen in Council, to grant, sell, alienate 15 and convey in fee-simple all or any of the said Clergy Reserves; and that in the letters patent granting such lands they shall be designated as Clergy Reserves, and that no reservation of lands in respect of such grants shall be necessary, notwithstanding any thing contained in the Act passed in the thirty-first year of the 31 G. 3,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.278 | 0.037 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".