MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6989976863

Characterization of the respiratory phenotype of the Late Gestation Lung 1 («Lgl1») heterozygote mouse

2009· other· en· W6989976863 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaLungPathophysiologyPhenotypeSecretionKnockout mouseDiseaseRespiratory system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a disease characterized by an arrest in alveolar development, remains one of the leading causes of morbidity in very low birth weight newborns [1, 2]. Insight into the mechanisms and genes involved in alveolarization could be used to better understand the lung pathophysiology of this disease and help with the development of new treatment interventions. Lgl1, is a developmentally regulated, glucocorticoid induced, secreted glycoprotein in the lung [3]. In O2 toxicity animal models of BPD, Lgl1 levels are reduced and return to normal during recovery in air [4]. To determine if a deficiency of Lgl1 is associated with arrested alveolarization and contributes to the pathophysiology of BPD, an Lgl1 knockout mouse model was created. Lgl1 deficiency revealed a complex phenotype including: goblet cell hyperplasia, mucus production, increase expression of interleukins 4 and 13, disruption of lung development, elastin fragmentation and disruption of lung function suggesting that Lgl1 deficiency may contribute to BPD in the neonatal period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→