Comparison between the roles of the Hancocks and the Rotches in the making of the United States of America through the codfishing and whaling industries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comparaison des rôles des firmes Hancock & Nephew et Rotch & Sons avant et pendant la révolution américaine et les constantes oppositions entre les industries morutière et baleinière en Nouvelle-Angleterre de la déportation des Acadiens en 1755 à la guerre de 1812, au Massachusetts. Oppositions commerciale, stratégique, militaire (quant à la Nouvelle-France et les grands bancs terre-neuvas), idéologique (morutiers travaillant pour nourrir les esclaves des plantations de canne à sucre aux Antilles et armateurs baleiniers quakers abolitionnistes, morutiers patriotes et armateurs baleiniers neutres), physique (opposition entre John Hancock et les frères Rotch lors de la Boston Tea Party). L'interaction entre la colonisation du Massachusetts à partir de 1620, le commerce et l'invention du droit américain, l'indépendance commerciale et politique dans les année 1760 et 1770, les guerres entre la France et la Grande-Bretagne au dix-huitième siècle pour le contrôle du Canada et de Terre-Neuve puis entre la Grande-Bretagne et les Etats-Unis en 1812.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".