MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990103397

A cortisone sensitive CD3low subset of CD4+CD8â thymocytes represents an intermediate stage in intrathymic repertoire selection

2017· other· en· W6990103397 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuereroDoc Digital Library · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council CanadaWellcome Trust
KeywordsCortisoneThymocyteNegative selectionT-cell receptorTransgeneDouble negativeGeneDownregulation and upregulationRatón
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two populations of CD4 single positive (SP) thymocytes were found In transgenic mice bearing class l-restricted Mls-1a reactive (Vβ8.1) TCR genes in the absence of the restriction element. CD3high CD4 sp cells were deleted In the presence of Mls-15 and were cortisone resistant, whereas CD3low CD4 SP cells were not deleted In the presence of Mls-1* and were cortisone sensitive. Intravenous transfer of CD3low CD4 SP cells into nude mice resulted in significant peripheral expansion of these cells with apparent upregulation of CD3. These data Indicate that CD3low CD4 SP thymocytes represent an Intermediate stage In the transition from CDSlow double positive (DP) to CD3high SP thymocytes and raise the possibility that these cells may have undergone positive but not negative selection events (at least to Mls-1a). Furthermore the fact that CD3high DP thymocytes were also deleted by Mls-1a in these mice suggests strongly that sensitivity to Mls-1a deletion is dependent upon stage of thymic maturation (as revealed by TCR density) rather than CD4/CD8 phenotype

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuereroDoc Digital LibraryFrench-language works237,207