Conference Introduction and Welcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aspects ofEntrepreneurship in Canada and the United States.As many of you have been here for five, ten and in several instances we have people who have been here all 23 years of the Conference, you know that we run a pretty tight schedule, bell included.So the biographical information of all of the speakers this morning, as well as the most updated schedule, is presented in this programthis six by nine that was available at the registration desk.This is about as up-to-date as we possibly could have it.It came from the printer last evening.I think there is one speaker change, which you will be apprised of tomorrow.Likewise, at the registration desk, there are the Conference materialsavailable at the front desk as well.This has background information for all of the sessions that we are having.As many of you are aware, this event has been approved by the Supreme Court of Ohio for 17.5 hours of Continuing Legal Education credit.The Supreme Court of Ohio is fully electronic right now so the process has changed a bit; there are no more bubble cards for those of you that are familiar with that process.The CLE registration desk is outside in the front as well, and that will be done electronically.In terms of logistics, for those of you that drove in from Cleveland, Northeastern Ohio, or elsewhere, parking is available across the street at the Cleveland Botanical Gardens.Keep your ticket with you at all times and they will validate you on your way out.That is complementary parking.I know many of you are staying at the Glidden House.There is also parking available there for the guests that are staying there.For those of you that have been with us as in the past, you recognize this morning is a breach of our customary tradition of opening the event with the founder of the Canada-United States Law Institute: Sidney Picker.Sidney is enjoying retirement in beautiful Sanibel, Florida, and he expresses his regrets
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".