MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990127354

The Controlled Active Ventilation Environment Laboratory (CAVE) – Resilient Buildings and Indoor Environments

2023· other· en· W6990127354 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUCL Discovery (University College London) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre de Géomatique du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)Air quality indexVentilation (architecture)Indoor air qualityPlan (archaeology)Thermal comfortCaveCalibrationFull scale
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UCL’s CAVE is a new laboratory which just completed construction in East London, which specialises in urban fluid mechanics, air pollution, Indoor Air Quality (IAQ), and thermal comfort. The lab is designed to measure, quantify risks, provide data for model calibration and test solutions at full scale. CAVE is a complex climate- and ventilation-controlled indoor laboratory. With a plan area of 206 m2 and height of 9 m, CAVE’s large size allows fully monitored and full scale “living labs” to be built inside the laboratory space. The laboratory systems enable simultaneous creation of independent “interior” and “exterior” environments within the lab at a large temperature range (-5°C to 43°C) to reproduce a wide range of realistic climate and air quality scenarios. CAVE can be used to simulate indoor classroom environments to test impacts of building ventilation and climate control technologies or strategies, low-cost technologies and green infrastructure, for a wide range of climate conditions. The lab can enable people to participate in experiments so as to understand the user’s response to those in terms of usability, thermal comfort, social and cognitive impacts and wellbeing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUCL Discovery (University College London)French-language works237,207