MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990274111

Development of a Python package for Functional Data Analysis. Depth measures, applications and clustering

2019· dissertation· en· W6990274111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Fuzzy clusteringFuzzy logicFunction (biology)Spurious relationship
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the problem of analyzing functional data is addressed. Each observation in functional
\ndata is a function that varies over a continuum. This kind of complex data is increasingly becoming
\nmore common in many research fields. However, Functional Data Analysis (FDA) is a relatively recent
\nfield in which software implementations are basically limited to R. In addition, although they may follow
\nan open-source scheme, the contribution to them may turn out to be complicated. The final goal of this
\nproject is to provide a comprehensive Python package for Functional Data Analysis, scikit-fda.
\nIn this undergraduate thesis, the functionality implemented in the package includes functional depth
\nmeasures together with their applications and elementary notions of clustering. In a functional space,
\nestablishing an order is complicated due to its nature. Depth measures allow to define robust statistics
\nfor functional data. In the package you can find some of the most common, Fraiman and Muniz depth
\nmeasure, the band depth measure or a modification of the latter, the modified band depth. Depth measures
\nare used in the construction of graphic tools, both the functional boxplot and the magnitude-shape
\nplot are introduced in the package along with their outlier detection procedures. Furthermore, contributions
\nin the area of machine learning are made in which basic clustering algorithms are added to the
\npackage: K-means and Fuzzy K-means. Finally, the results of applying these methods to the Canadian
\nWeather dataset are shown.
\nThe Python package is published in a GitHub repository. It is open-source wth the aim of growing
\nand being kept up to date. In the long term it is expected to cover the fundamental techniques in FDA
\nand become a widely-used toolbox for research in FDA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it