Détermination de la composition chimique descendres provenant de centrales thermiques au pétrole par activation neutronique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Principe de fonctionnement des centrales thermiques au pétrole -- Quantité de cendres produites -- Disposition des déchets -- Risques potentiels -- Principe de l'analyse par activation -- Rappel de notions fondamentales -- méthode d'activation utilisée et relations mathématiques correspondantes -- Interaction des rayons gamma avec la matière -- Analyse du spectre -- Limite de détection et de décision -- Expérimentation en laboratoire -- Préparation des échantillons -- Appareils utilisés -- Les mesures effectuées -- Analyse de capsule vide -- Analyse quantitative du standard SRM 1633a -- Analyse quantitative des échantillons -- La centrale de Tracy, Québec -- Central de Lennox, Ontario -- Centrale de Tufts-Cove, Nouvelle Écosse -- Centrale de Coleson Cove, Nouveau-Brunswick -- Validité des résultats et limitation de l'analyse par activation -- Analyse de la granulométrie -- Comparaison des cendres volantes et cendres de fond de centrales thermiques au pétrole -- Comparaison des concentrations des cendres volantes de centrales thermiques au charbon et au pétrole -- Sources d'erreurs -- Valorisation des cendres -- Utilisation du vanadium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".