Descripción de los estilos de vida asociados a Diabetes Mellitus Tipo II en adultos mayores que acuden al centro Médico PUMEDSA de la ciudad de Portoviejo, en el último trimestre del 2014 y primer trimestre del 2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demographic, epidemiological and socioeconomic changes, who suffered adult population ecuadorian mayor, have modified their lifestyles, on practices, customs and knowledge about healthy lo and behold not healthy. \nIn this sense the prevalence of chronic degenerative diseases as diabetes mellitus type II factor act as a broker vulnerability organ sets - functional , which brings complications that increase the business risk in this susceptible population Mortality one Constants homeostatic changes . \nSo the present cross-sectional study is a descriptive research , qualitative - quantitative describe lifestyle associated with diabetes mellitus type II in 80 older adults attending Medical Center PUMEDSA Portoviejo city , province Manabí during the last quarter of 2014 and primer quarter 2015 . \nData obtained from Medical records, questionnaires, interviews and group were admitted the focal base data created in EPI INFO V.3.5 with arabic encoding for each participant, by graphs and charts Excel 2010 Microsoft Office Program. \nThen describe the Lifestyle of the elderly, which is found these unhealthy percentage were bathroom one, here research results are socialized, promote healthy lifestyles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".