MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990284056

Data-Organizing for Labor Action

2023· article· en· W6990284056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship @ Claremont (The Claremont Colleges) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)Labor relationsLabor unionLabor disputesVisualizationThe labor problemLabour law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNITE HERE is a labor union representing over 300,000 workers across the United States and Canada. Although the union has an extensive capacity for labor organizing, there is great potential for improved data infrastructure to strengthen the decision-making processes of labor campaigns. This Harvey Mudd College 2022-23 Clinic project aimed to expand UNITE HERE’s data-organizing capabilities through the development of a centralized and accessible data visualization tool that will allow a wide range of users to make data-informed decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.013
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0160.017
Open science0.0040.012
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship @ Claremont (The Claremont Colleges)Same topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207