MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990288361

Describing Digital Object Environments in PREMIS: Paper - iPRES 2012 - Digital Curation Institute, iSchool, Toronto

2012· article· en· W6990288361 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhaidra (Universität Wien) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsUSableMetadataDigital preservationDigital curationObject (grammar)Data curationOrder (exchange)Digital Earth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital preservation metadata" is the information that is needed in order to preserve digital objects successfully in the longterm so that they can be deployed in some form in the future.A digital object is not usable without a computing environment in which it can be rendered or executed.Because of this, information that describes the sufficient components of the digital object's computing environment has to be part of its preservation metadata.Although there are semantic units for recording environment information in PREMIS 2, these have rarely, if ever, been used.Prompted by increasing interest in the description of computing environments, this paper describes on-going efforts within the PREMIS data dictionary's Editorial Committee to define an improved metadata description for them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.895
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhaidra (Universität Wien)Same topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207