MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990296275

DEMONSTRATION: MONSTROUS OPERATIONS IN SCULPTURAL PRODUCTION AND DISPLAY

2011· article· en· W6990296275 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrafts, Textile, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSculptureExhibitionUncannyContext (archaeology)Representation (politics)StudioSpace (punctuation)Quilt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sculpture is an equivocal medium, at once occupying the abstract space of representation and the real space of the viewer. This dual nature often produces an uncanny or monstrous experience for the viewer who feels drawn into the space of the work, and who is met by its disruptive, but evasive presence. This monstrous condition is revealed in modem and contemporary sculptural practices that have sought to complicate the dynamics of the relationship that sculpture has had with the furniture used in its production and display. Manipulations of the pedestal and the workbench, in various degrees of integration with the work, demonstrate (a word connected to revealing and monstrosity) this monstrous condition by providing both a transition and a barrier at the borders of meaning.\nIn fulfillment of the Project-Based Stream of the PhD in Art and Visual Culture, the material in this thesis consists of three parts. The first part is a written thesis that utilizes an image from the 1931 film version of Frankenstein as a model for looking at sculptural practices and the furniture of its production and display. The second is a record of my studio research, which is based in sculpture and is directly engaged in the questions described here. Workbench forms used to produce sculptural artifacts are then used as ‘pedestals’ in the context of an exhibition. This work culminates in an exhibition at the McIntosh Gallery, in London Ontario. The third part documents Parker Branch, an ongoing collaborative curatorial project of which I am a part. The project consists of a small museum space that mounts a rotating exhibition program of found objects, with an emphasis on lateral diversions in meaning engendered by manipulations of traditional taxonomic systems. What is shared among these projects is an engagement with material artifacts and the mechanisms by which they are displayed. Each project explores the ways in which those mechanisms shape the production of meaning through various corruptions in linear development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicCrafts, Textile, and DesignFrench-language works237,207