MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990349806

Development of Lunar Rover Steering Systems based on Synthetic Computer Vision and Reinforcement Learning

2025· article· en· W6990349806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningTraverseTeleoperationSynthetic dataObstacle avoidanceLidarConvolutional neural networkTerrainState (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As humanity prepares to return to the Moon and establish long-term presence, the demand for autonomous systems capable of navigating unstructured, GPS-denied environments becomes critical. Lunar rovers, tasked with exploration, science, and logistics, must traverse challenging terrains where human teleoperation is limited by communication latency and environmental unpredictability. This thesis investigates two complementary machine learning approaches for autonomous lunar rover navigation and obstacle avoidance: supervised learning via computer vision-based behavioral cloning, and reinforcement learning (RL) using LiDAR data in a simulated environment. The first approach focuses on a CNN-LSTM architecture trained via behavioral cloning. The system learns to imitate human driving behavior by mapping sequences of images and rover state information to steering commands. A multi-branch convolutional neural network processes three visual perspectives (front, left, right), which are then concatenated with state inputs and passed to a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) module to capture temporal dependencies. The model was trained using a combination of real-world data from the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and synthetic data generated in ESA’s VORTEX simulation framework using Unreal Engine. Domain randomization and data augmentation were used to enhance generalization. Experiments revealed that combining synthetic and real data improves prediction accuracy and robustness, while the temporal modeling of the LSTM reduces erratic steering behaviors. The second approach applies Deep Q-Networks (DQN) for end-to-end obstacle avoidance, using LiDAR readings as state input and discrete steering actions as outputs. Implemented in simulation environments like Gazebo, the agent learns optimal navigation strategies by interacting with its environment, receiving positive rewards for safe progress and penalties for collisions. Unlike behavioral cloning, this RL-based method does not rely on human demonstrations and can adapt to new environments through trial and error. Although slower to converge and requiring careful reward shaping, the reinforcement learning policy exhibited strong generalization in unseen scenarios after sufficient training. By exploring both paradigms—supervised imitation learning and reinforcement learning—this thesis offers a comparative analysis of their strengths, limitations, and suitability for lunar robotics. Behavioral cloning benefits from data efficiency and rapid deployment when human demonstrations are available, but struggles in out-of-distribution settings. In contrast, reinforcement learning shows promise in adaptive decision-making and long-term planning but faces challenges in training stability and sample efficiency. This work also emphasizes the importance of sim-to-real transfer, simulation fidelity, and multi-modal perception in the development of autonomous systems for planetary exploration. The integration of computer vision, spatiotemporal reasoning, and sensor-based learning highlights the need for hybrid systems that combine the robustness of learned perception with the adaptability of reinforcement-based control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207