Diseño de un curso de formación continuada en cuidados paliativos basado en competencias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de esta publicación es mostrar la estructura y contenidos de un curso de formación continuada en cuidados paliativos para enfermería. Se han empleado las últimas tendencias metodológicas en educación, y se ha tomado como referencia el modelo de competencias de la Facultad de Enfermería de la Universidad de Montreal. El resultado de la investigación ha conducido al diseño de un curso, del que los profesionales de la enfermería se pueden beneficiar para mejorar sus habilidades para el cuidado paliativo. Contemplar nuevos enfoques en la formación intermedia de cuidados paliativos en enfermería, frente a los viejos métodos de aprendizaje, proporciona una mayor integración de los modelos actuales, y promueve la calidad y la satisfacción asistencial en el contexto en el que se desarrollan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".