MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6990528547

Dysregulation in Childhood and Adolescence: Measurement, Development, and Correlates

2019· article· en· W6990528547 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmotional dysregulationCBCLConceptualizationChild Behavior ChecklistPsychometricsMental healthStrengths and Difficulties QuestionnairePoison controlHuman factors and ergonomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many children and adolescents referred to clinical mental health institutions present a complex picture of co-occurring internalizing problems (e.g. anxiety) and externalizing problems (e.g. aggressive behavior). These ‘dysregulated’ children have problems with regulating affect, behavior and cognition, and are at increased risk for maladaptive outcomes. The DP has emerged as a reliable and valid measure of the complex phenotype of dysregulation and is generally defined by elevated scores on three syndrome scales of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), namely the Anxious/Depressed, Aggressive Behavior and Attention Problems (or AAA-)scales. The CBCL is a well-known and widely used parent-reported instrument to chart behavioral and emotional problems of children and adolescents. In this dissertation, five empirical studies on the DP are presented, utilizing four different data sets from three countries (Belgium, Canada, United States). A multi-method and multi-informant approach were adopted. The first aim was to examine the conceptualization and measurement of the DP. Results from factor analyses revealed that a bifactor model best described the profile structure of the AAA-scales that comprise the DP. A bifactor model is a hierarchical model where items (symptoms) load on both on a general underlying factor of Dysregulation as well as one of three specific factors of Anxiety/Depression, Aggressive Behavior or Attention Problems. The same result was found across samples, instruments (CBCL and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires), developmental periods (early childhood, middle childhood and adolescence), and reporters (mothers, fathers, teachers, youth themselves). As such, this dissertation provides robust evidence that the DP can best be conceptualized as a broad syndrome of dysregulation which exists over and above specific problems related to affect, behavior, and cognition. This bifactor model bears strong resemblance to models of a ‘general factor of psychopathology’ (GP or ‘p factor’), and integration of both fields of literature is thus warranted. The second aim was to examine stability and change of the DP. Findings showed that across different samples, relative stability of the DP (i.e., the extent to which the relative differences in the DP among children remain the same over time) was strong for parent-reported DP and moderate for teacher-reported DP. The specific factors such as Anxiety/Depression were only weak to moderately stable. This suggests that while dysregulation, as a general vulnerability for developing different forms of psychopathology, is more stable than its specific manifestations. While homotypic continuity (e.g., dysregulation predicting dysregulation at a later time point) was strongest, there was also evidence for heterotypic continuity. This indicates that specific manifestations of psychopathology (e.g., anxiety/depression) increase risk of comorbid psychopathology (i.e., dysregulation) across time and vice versa. Furthermore, in this general population sample, the DP was found to follow a nonlinear developmental course, peaking in early adolescence. Specifically, DP scores increased from age 4 to 11, and then decreased (which looks like an inverted U-shape). The third aim was to investigate early childhood antecedents, adolescent outcomes and psychophysiological correlates of the DP. This dissertation further established the DP as a broad risk marker, as we found that the DP predicted a range of negative outcomes including personality pathology, mental health problems, and psychosocial maladjustment. We added to a scarce body of research on antecedents by showing that the DP is predicted by early temperament and self-control, and family factors including maternal depression and parenting. Exploratory findings showed that the DP was linked to higher resting heart rate, reflecting chronic overarousal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)→Same topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development→French-language works237,207→