Drying characteristics of Saskatoon berries under microwave and combined microwave-convection heating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study on dehydration of frozen saskatoon berries and the need for dried fruits have been strategically identified in the Canadian Prairies. The motivation for this research was to find a suitable method for dehydration and extend saskatoon berry shelf life for long term preservation. Microwave, convection and microwave-convection combination drying processes were identified to finish-dry saskatoon berries after osmotic dehydration, using sucrose and high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) sugar solutions. Osmotic dehydration removes moisture in small quantities introducing solutes into the fruit that acts as a preservative and also reduces the total drying time. Due to the very short harvesting season of saskatoon berries, an accelerated process such as the microwave combination drying can reduce the moisture to safe storage levels immediately after harvest. Untreated and osmotically dehydrated berries were subjected to convection (control), microwave and microwave-convection combination drying conditions at different product drying temperatures (60, 70 and 80oC) until final moisture content was 25% dry basis. A laboratory-scale microwave combination dryer was developed with integrated temperature and moisture loss data acquisition systems using LabView 6i software. A thin-layer cross flow dryer was used for convection-only drying and for comparison. Drying kinetics of the process were studied and curve fitting with five empirical equations, including the Page equation, was carried out to determine drying constant, R2 and standard error values. The microwave-combination drying method proved to be the best for drying saskatoon berries. Dehydrated product quality analyses were accomplished by measuring the color changes, rehydration ratio and any structural changes, using a scanning electron microscope technique.This research was instrumental in the modification and development of a novel drying system for high-moisture agricultural materials (fruits). Microwave-convection combination drying at 70oC, yielded good results with higher drying rates and better end-product quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".