MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990597771

Drug shortages mitigation of supply chain in the Canadian hospital pharmacy

2023· other· en· W6990597771 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace École de technologie supérieure (École de technologie supérieure) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainHospital pharmacyPharmacyEconomic shortageHealth careInventory managementSupply chain managementPharmaceutical manufacturing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drug shortage is a complicated issue worldwide, which also causes several negative impacts to the whole Canada’s pharmaceutical supply chain because of various factors that include an unforeseen increase in demand, trouble obtaining direct raw materials or labour, sudden production problems, sole sourcing manufacturing issues, legislative and regulatory problems, distribution factors, and natural disasters. Furthermore, the existing inventory management with manual operation and inventory management in the hospital pharmacy cannot prevent drug shortage. In fact, this issue is very critical in the Canadian healthcare system which is recently calling several investigation and research to mitigate negative impact and risk to the health care system. \n \nIn order to highlight the critical factors which could lead to the drug shortages and affecting the supply chain and the inventory management strategies in Canadian hospital pharmacies, our thesis is firstly to contribute a whole picture of the Canadian hospital pharmacies by presenting an analysis of Drug Shortage in Canada from 2016 –2021 and a comprehensive Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to extract the critical factors performing a wide review of the Canadian hospital pharmacies and to understand how the continued perturbation occurred in this process and affected to the drug shortages. We have used the open data from Canadian Medical Association (CMA) database and analytical stochastic methods to illustrate the survey result. \n \nBased on the intensive survey, we next go in the practical model of drug shortage in the Hospital Supply Chain (HSC) in which we contribute an optimization model to avoid the medicine shortage problem in a hospital and propose a learning method to automatically manage the inventory. Specifically, a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) mechanism is designed based on the optimization model to operate the inventory under an online fashion in which refilling drug decision is automatically determined based on the observation of price, demand, current level of drugs. A penalty cost is also added in the objective function to minimize not only the drug shortage issue but also the over-provisioning situation. \n \nFurthermore, In this thesis, a numerical result has been presented to verify the performance of the proposed approach which outperforms the online benchmarks such as (Over-provisioning, Ski-rental, and Max-min) in terms of the refilling cost and the shortage rate. \n \nTo conclude, we focus on the medication shortage in Canada in this thesis to provide an extensive analysis over a lengthy period of time, from 2016 to 2021. We contribute to the study of this topic by using an actual data set and stochastic analytical approaches. We propose an intensive literature study as a follow-up to the analysis to sketch the drug shortage picture of the hospital’s pharmacy supply chain. The findings of the study and survey will aid us in furthering our research by constructing an inventory management optimization model. Besides that, and based on DRL, a deep learning strategy was developed to manage autonomously inventories in the hospital pharmacy in order to prevent drug shortages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace École de technologie supérieure (École de technologie supérieure)French-language works237,207