MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6990643878

Elucidating functional interactions of the RET receptor tyrosine kinase in cancer using a synthetic dosage lethal screen

2024· dissertation· en· W6990643878 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceptor tyrosine kinaseNeuroblastomaTyrosine kinaseCancerGenetic screenTransdifferentiationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retSignal transductionGeneTranscription factor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RET (REarranged during Transfection) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that plays essential roles in the early development of the kidneys and neural crest-derived lineages (e.g., enteric nervous system). Its ability to activate pro-growth signaling pathways has implicated RET in several malignancies. While a clear oncogenic role for RET has been established, the precise molecular mechanisms that contribute to RET-mediated oncogenic growth are less well known. To address this gap, we performed an unbiased, genome-wide synthetic dosage lethal (SDL) screen in collaboration with Dr. Franco Vizeacoumar (University of Saskatchewan) to uncover genes that are functionally linked to RET-mediated growth of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. This project used an integrative bioinformatics approach that combined statistical analysis with machine learning to identify and prioritize candidate genes from the screen results. Two genes, ASCL1 and NCAM1, were selected for experimental validation of our approach. The work presented in this thesis provides the first known evidence of a role for ASCL1 in transcription of RET in a neuroblastoma cell line. Furthermore, we show that NCAM1 may play a role in transdifferentiation of SH-SY5Y cells which may modulate cell growth. Together, this project serves as an important proof-of-principle study for assessing the utility of the SDL screen in uncovering genes that contribute to RET-mediated processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→