MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990696293

An early morning Reconnaissance along the Appomattox River near Petersburg 1864.

2010· article· en· W6990696293 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWakeSpace (Wake Forest University) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAmerican History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRavineMileSpearShot (pellet)BankRiver valleySoviet unionQuarter (Canadian coin)Hearth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At 3 A. M. July 11, I was awakened by Capt. M. B. Bessey A.A.I.G. on the staff of Brig. Genl. Geo. J. Stannard comd�۪g 1st Div. 18th A. C. Our Hd. Qr. were in a spur of the big Ravine that commenced at the River and circled to the left for several miles just within the Union Lines. Together we walked up the ravine to Capt. Long�۪s quarters. Capt. Long was in command of the Division sharpshooters. After he joined us we took the road along the river for half a mile or more toward Point of Rocks; there crossing a wide field to the left, reached the woods lining the river bank. We kept along the bank toward the junction of the Appomattox and the James. It was still dark and we moved freely and safely, though involuntarily hastening our steps across the open spaces where we were exposed to any observers on the other side. We passed a 2 gun battery and occasionally a pit dug for the sharpshooters. As it began to grow light we came to a large tree just opposite the rebel fort, which marked the limits of the present trip. Here we crept about very cautiously, exposing ourselves as little as possible to the enemy�۪s sharpshooters, the river being quite narrow at this point. As the dawn came on, we got a very good view of the rebel works, and I began a sketch-map of the river, batteries and camps &c and their position in relation to our own works, estimating distances as accurately as possible. As soon as it was broad daylight��� and the sketch completed���we began our return trip, and here came the excitement. We had to move very carefully, keeping behind the bushes and trees which lined the river�۪s bank, running very swiftly and singly [?] as we passed the open spaces. We made some observations through the loopholes in the rifle-pits, and could plainly see the rebel camps, and men moving about, and we heard the bugles sounding perhaps the "Reveille." At the 2 gun battery we stopped quite a while getting a good view of the works and making some additions to the map. The Sergeant in charge reminded me that my white paper made a good mark and suggested that I carry it under cover. Keeping on we soon came to the place where we struck the river on our way out, but instead of crossing to the road we kept along the river to the battery on the point. Here was quite a stretch of uncovered ground which we had to cross, and we skipped over it in lively style, our speed accelerated by the singing of the "minies" which at least proclaimed the good intentions of "our friend the enemy." Passing down into the ravine we regaled ourselves on the delicious blackberries which grew very abundantly at that point. Climbing the side of the ravine, we found ourselves in a covered way through which we passed into the battery. It was known as "Dan�۪s battery," sometimes called the "Point battery" as the point upon which it was located was somewhat prominent just at the bend of the river. The battery mounted 2 ��� 30 pounder Parrott guns and several mortars. Standing directly behind, we could see the bomb leave the mortar and sail majestically into the air, the fuse hissing and sputtering as it went. A large telescope was mounted in one of the embrazures through which we looked directly into the city. Under the bridge connecting Petersburg and the opposite shore we saw a man in his shirt-sleeves carrying a bucket of water which he had just dipped from the river. A clock on one of the steeples indicated twenty minutes of six o�۪clock. We lingered here for quite a while but as we must get back to HdQurs., and withal were somewhat hungry, we left. It was our intention to get into the 2nd line [?] and get (as we thought we could) a fine view down the river, but as we must go across the "open" to do it, or go a long way round to keep under cover, we gave it up. Walking for a little distance along the edge of the bluff, we descended into the ravine, and, once hidden by the trees made our way back to camp, arriving just in season for a bountiful breakfast of Hard Tack & coffee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWakeSpace (Wake Forest University)Same topicAmerican History and CultureFrench-language works237,207