El clero catedralicio en la España moderna: los miembros del cabildo de la catedral de Córdoba (1475-1808)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate a group that was an important part of local elites in the Hispanic Monarchy: that of the members of a Cathedral Chapter. It was conducted through the analysis of the specific case of Córdoba, however, the purpose was the achievement of extrapolative results. A wide chronological approach was required for wide-ranging conclusions within the framework of the long duration of the early modern period, which is why the exam covers from the last quarter of the 15th century to the end of the Ancien Régime. A deep knowledge of international bibliography and a massive and rigorous use of the documentation from several archives were the basis of this thesis. The results revealed how the Cathedral Chapter worked as a superb machinery that channeled social mobility and legitimized it due to the constant re-creation of the same corporate image, from which each of its members and, by extension, their families benefited. Throughout the studied period, behind a façade of steadiness the sociological composition of the Cathedral Chapter evolved significantly. The institution had a clear functionality of which different groups made use of. Economic and relational capital was transformed by its institutional symbolic power: converso families, rural elites and urban mesocracy were integrated into the local aristocracy, by following a specific channel and without destabilizing the theoretical basis of a system that could hardly accept change. The role of an international market of ecclesiastical benefices established by Rome was vital: tools like resignations or coadjutories made possible a precocious instrumentalization of the Chapter institution. The interpretation of this social phenomenon as a whole has been the ultimate result of this work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".