MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990726486

The effect of macroeconomic variables on Sukuk Issuance in Malaysia

2021· other· en· W6990726486 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUUM Electronic Theses and Dissertation [eTheses] (Northern University of Malaysia) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSukukVariance decomposition of forecast errorsInflation (cosmology)Index (typography)Error correction modelCapital marketInterest rateExchange rateQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Islamic capital market, particularly sukuk has a prime role to the development of Islamic finance into a mainstream force for global financial industry. This study aims to investigate the effect of macroeconomic variables on Sukuk issuance in Malaysia from the period of first quarter of 2005 till the fourth quarter of 2019. The main objective of this study is to analyze the relationship of Sukuk issuance in Malaysia with selected macroeconomic variables; Bursa Malaysia composite index (BMCI), exchange rate (EXR), GDP, Inflation (INF) and interest rate (INT). This study employs time series analysis techniques such as Vector Error Correction Model (VECM), Johansen Co-Integration Analysis and Forecast Error Variance Decomposition (FEVD) Analysis to identify the relationship among variables in the short run and the long run. Based on our analysis, BMCI is the significant determinant factor of sukuk issuance in Malaysia in the long run while for the short run, the BMCI, EXR, and GDP, are significant. EXR is the most important contributor in short-term for sukuk issuance, followed by GDP and Bursa Malaysia (BMCI). Investors, regulators, and market participants may find this finding beneficial to recognise the crucial roles played by macroeconomic variables used in this study in determining the effect of macroeconomic variables on Sukuk issuance in Malaysia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUUM Electronic Theses and Dissertation [eTheses] (Northern University of Malaysia)French-language works237,207