MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990750256

El motivo narrativo de la "guerra contra la naturaleza" en la historiografía de Alejandro Magno: el caso de la conquista de la Roca Sogiana en Curcio Rufo y Arriano

2024· article· es· W6990750256 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRIUR (Universidad de La Rioja) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Studies and Legal History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaUniversity of TorontoAmerican Philological Association
KeywordsLineaCONQUESTQuantitative methodology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el presente artículo se presenta un estudio comparativo de un episodio (la conquista de la Roca Sogdiana) en dos historiadores de Alejandro Magno: Curcio Rufo y Arriano. El propósito de esta lectura comparativa será demostrar que, si bien ambos textos pueden leerse como relatos paradigmáticos del anhelo insaciable de conquistas que la historiografía antigua le atribuyó al rey macedonio (su pothos), en la versión de Curcio el tema es ampliado hasta adaptarlo a las características de un motivo habitual en la historiografía dedicada a los autócratas: el deseo de «hacer la guerra» a la naturaleza misma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it