MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990837375

Enhancing Clinical Support for Breast Cancer with Deep Learning Models using Optimized Synthetic Correlated Diffusion Imaging

2024· dissertation· en· W6990837375 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerDeep learningProstate cancerMagnetic resonance imagingModality (human–computer interaction)Convolutional neural networkBreast MRI
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer is the second most common type of cancer in women in Canada and the United States, representing over 25% of all new female cancer cases. The prevalence of breast cancer continues to grow, affecting about 300,000 females in the United States in 2023. However, there are different levels of severity of breast cancer requiring different treatment strategies, and hence, grading breast cancer and estimating treatment prognosis have become vital clinical tasks in breast cancer. \n \nRecently, a new form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) called synthetic correlated diffusion imaging (CDIs) was introduced to address the physical hardware limitations and showed considerable promise for clinical decision support for cancers such as prostate cancer when compared to current gold-standard MRI techniques. However, the efficacy for CDIs for other forms of cancers such as breast cancer has not been as well-explored. \n \nThis thesis explores and designs novel deep learning architectures for enhancing two breast cancer clinical task performance (pathologic complete response prediction and Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade classification) with optimized CDIs. A volumetric convolutional neural network is leveraged to learn volumetric deep radiomic features from a pre-treatment cohort, constructing a predictor based on the learned features for grade and post-treatment response prediction. The optimization of parameters for computing CDIs for breast cancer is also conducted through improving tumour delineation. \n \nThe proposed approach was evaluated using the ACRIN-6698 study and compared against current gold-standard MRI modalities. For grade prediction, using optimized CDIs achieved a leave-one-out cross-validation accuracy of 95.79%, which is over 16% above the next best gold-standard MRI modality and over 6% above using the unoptimized CDIs. Additionally, using optimized CDIs for post-treatment response prediction resulted in a leave-one-out cross-validation accuracy of 93.28%, which is over 8.5% above the next best gold-standard MRI modality and over 5.5% above using the unoptimized CDIs. \n \nThe proposed approach demonstrates how using optimized CDIs can be used to enhance the performance of breast cancer clinical tasks, indicating its potential as a valuable tool for oncologists to enhance patient treatment within the breast cancer domain and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicMRI in cancer diagnosisFrench-language works237,207