EL JUEGO DE PUNTOS DE VISTA EN LA CANTIGA GALLEGO-PORTUGUESA "LOAVAN UN DIA, EN LUGO, ELVIRA" DE JOHAN ROMEU DE LUGO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente trabajo estudiaremos la cantiga de escarnio Loavan un dia, en Lugo, Elvira, la única pieza del trovador gallego Johan Romeu de Lugo conservada en el Cancionero de la Biblioteca Nacional de Lisboa (B) y en el Cancionero de la Biblioteca Vaticana (V). La rúbrica explicativa, que acompaña a la cantiga en los manuscritos B 1612 y V 1145, compendia los elementos mínimos de una estructura narrativa que se desarrolla en la breve pieza y sobre la que se basa el poeta para componer un retrato literario y humorístico enfocado en el trovador Lopo Lías, ciego de un ojo. Asimismo, el poema ofrece la estampa femenina de Elvira que se va creando mediante puntos de vista o voces narrativas varias. Nos centraremos en el análisis de la variedad de puntos de vista desplegados en la pieza (y reforzados por la narración de la rúbrica explicativa) y, a partir de esta tarea, profundizaremos en las formas del macrorretrato y del microrretrato. Este estudio nos permitirá explicar los vínculos entre el juego de perspectivas y el recurso lírico del equívoco el vira Elvira, asociado también a lo visual, así como comprender la recreación de la figura de Lopo Lías como jogador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".