Estimation du paramètre d'une copule archimedienne en présence de censure dépendante
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les méthodes classiques d’analyse de survie notamment la méthode non paramétrique de Kaplan et Meier (1958) supposent l’indépendance entre les variables d’intérêt et de censure. Mais, cette hypothèse d’indépendance n’étant pas toujours soutenable, plusieurs auteurs ont élaboré des méthodes pour prendre en compte la dépendance. La plupart de ces méthodes émettent des hypothèses sur cette dépendance. Dans ce mémoire, nous avons proposé une méthode d’estimation de la dépendance en présence de censure dépendante qui utilise le copula-graphic estimator pour les copules archimédiennes (Rivest etWells, 2001) et suppose la connaissance de la distribution de la variable de censure. Nous avons ensuite étudié la consistance de cet estimateur à travers des simulations avant de l’appliquer sur un jeu de données réelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".