MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990941152

Evaluation of the impact of azo dyes on the metabolism of stabilized fecal communities and in vitro cell culture

2018· dissertation· en· W6990941152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicDye analysis and toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Food Safety AuthorityWorld Health Organization
KeywordsTartrazineMetabolismIn vitroFecesGut floraHuman fecesSecretionCell culture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human gut microbiota is a complex and dynamic ecosystem of microbes existing in symbiosis with the host and can be altered by diet. Azo dyes are present in a large portion of our diet. To investigate the impact of azo dyes on gut microbial metabolites, a stabilized fecal slurry was subjected to Tartrazine exposure and metabolites were analyzed via 1-dimensional proton nuclear magnetic resonance. Results revealed that Tartrazine had a negative effect on 10 out of 13 profiled metabolites. Tartrazine had a negative impact on the transepithelial resistance of in vitro cultured Caco2 epithelial cells and increased the secretion of TNFα. Data from Guelph Health Family Studies suggested that children up to 6 years of age tend to consume 1.2 meals daily containing azo dye. This study suggests that dyes present in food interact with gut microbiota; the resulting metabolites may cause inflammation, leading to effects on human health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicDye analysis and toxicityFrench-language works237,207