MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990955054

Estudio histórico-arqueológico de Aledo y Totana en los siglos XV y XVI

2016· dissertation· es· W6990955054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of Medieval Iberia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)FrontierQuarter (Canadian coin)Order (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo principal de esta tesis de doctorado es conocer la organización del espacio y la sociedad que le dio forma y habitó en los actuales municipios de Aledo y Totana (Murcia) durante los siglos XV y XVI, un periodo cronológico fundamental, la transición entre el fin de la Edad Media y el inicio de la Moderna, pues a lo largo del mismo tuvieron lugar los cambios que definirán la trayectoria histórica de las poblaciones de Aledo y Totana.\n\nPor ese motivo se consideró necesario clarificar en lo posible el medio natural, el territorio, el poblamiento y las comunicaciones, las características urbanas de ambas localidades, las actividades agrícola y ganadera y sus espacios, los aprovechamientos del monte, etc., para hacer el seguimiento de la evolución del conjunto en dicho marco temporal.\n\nCon el fin de alcanzar el objetivo propuesto hemos manejado la siguiente información disponible: fuentes documentales de los siglos XIII-XVI, en mayor medida, resultados de prospecciones e intervenciones arqueológicas y datos arqueológicos obtenidos de la propia documentación escrita, y bibliografía. La combinación de fuentes escritas y testimonios arqueológicos suele ser muy valiosa, y en nuestro caso, ha sido muy importante en algunos campos (sistema defensivo, red de caminos, sistemas hidráulicos, etc.).\n\nEn cuanto a las conclusiones de este estudio destacamos:\n\nAledo y Totana, en cuanto a su evolución como núcleos urbanos, siguieron caminos diferentes. Ambos pertenecían a la Orden de Santiago desde 1257. A finales del siglo XIII, Totana, que estaba en el valle de Guadalentín, se despobló mientras Aledo mantuvo habitantes al estar situado en un lugar elevado y defendido por una muralla. Era un enclave bien adaptado a tiempos de inseguridad por la proximidad de la frontera con el reino de Granada. A partir de la segunda mitad del siglo XV, el reino de Murcia entraba en una fase de crecimiento económico y poblacional y Totana renació como aldea de Aledo. A partir del XVI, al estar situada cerca de grandes vías de comunicación, y con muchas tierras por roturar en el valle, se desarrolló más que la villa. De hecho, el concejo se trasladó a Totana en 1545. Desde entonces, Aledo perdió muchos habitantes y no se recuperó.\n\nTotana pasó de tener una ermita, un horno de pan y una carnicería a contar a finales del siglo XVI con varios hornos de pan, edificios religiosos, almazaras, ventas, taller de alfarería, abastecimiento de agua, etc. Aledo, por su parte, mantuvo las dotaciones que tenía a principios de dicha centuria.\n\nLos límites territoriales de Aledo con los términos vecinos (Lorca, Alhama y Mula) quedaron establecidos definitivamente por sentencias reales, tras pleitos, a finales del siglo XV.\n\nEn la etapa bajomedieval, en el término de Aledo había cuatro huertas llamadas del común, de todos los vecinos: Patalache, las Viñas, El Colomí y Tirieza, y Totana, las tres últimas especializadas en vid, olivo y morera, respectivamente. En el XVI, el aumento de población trajo consigo el aumento de las zonas de regadío, en esta ocasión, de propiedad particular. También se incrementó la producción de cereal, buena prueba de ello es que en el siglo XV había un molino harinero y a finales del XVI eran siete.\n\nDesde la concesión del fuero a Aledo, el concejo administró una dehesa alrededor de la villa, el Buhalaje, mientras el resto del término quedaba en manos de los comendadores. Ahora bien, en la década de 1520, la Orden se centró en percibir rentas y derechos señoriales y el concejo se hizo con la gestión de todo el territorio.\n\nThe following doctoral thesis’ main aim is to know both the space organization and the society that shaped it and lived in the current villages of Aledo and Totana during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, which was a crucial chronological period. It portrays the transition from the end of the Middle Ages to the beginning of the Modern Era, and over the course of this period, the changes which will determine the history of Aledo and Totana took place.\n\nIt is for this reason that it was necessary to clarify such aspects as the environment, the land, the settlement and communication, the urban characteristics of these two villages, the agricultural and farming activities and their areas, or the use of the mountain, in order to provide a useful follow-up of their evolution in this period.\n\nHaving this purpose in mind, the following available information has been used: Firstly, and to a large extent, documentary sources from the thirteenth to the sixteenth centuries have been very useful. Secondly, the results found in some archaeological survey reports and the data obtained from the written paperwork itself, have also been of paramount importance. Finally, some more information was collected from the bibliography. The combination of written sources and archaeological evidence is usually very valuable, and in this study, it has been especially important in some fields; for instance, the defensive fields, the road network, or the hydraulic system, to name but a few. \n\nAs far as the conclusions of this study are concerned, the ones below are highlighted:\n\nFirst of all, and in terms of its evolution as urban areas, it is clear that Aledo and Totana took different routes. Both villages belonged to the Order of Santiago since 1257. However, at the end of the thirteenth century, Totana, which was located in the Valley of Guadalentín, became depopulated, whereas Aledo kept inhabitants because it was placed in an elevated location and it was defended by a wall. It was also a privileged spot in times of instability, due to its closeness to the border with the Kingdom of Granada. From the second half of the fifteenth century on, the Kingdom of Murcia experienced an economic and population growth, and Totana witnessed its own revival as the small village of Aledo. In the sixteenth century, Totana developed more than Aledo, since the former was located near the most important communication roads, and it also owned much land to clear and replant. In fact, the municipal council moved to Totana in 1545. Ever since, Aledo lost many of its inhabitants and never recovered.\nSecondly, Totana moved from having a shrine, a bakery stove and a butcher’s to counting on several bakery stoves, religious buildings, mills, selling points, a pottery workshop, and its own water supply in the sixteenth century. Aledo, on the other hand, kept its original endowment since the beginning of the century.\n\nThirdly, Aledo’s territorial boundaries with its neighbouring territories, i.e. Lorca, Alhama and Mula, were finally established by royal decrees at the end of the fifteenth century, and not without some litigation.\n\nFourthly, in the late Middle Ages, Aledo had four orchards, referred to as “common areas”: Patalache, Las Viñas, El Colomí and Tirieza, and Totana, the last three of them dedicated to grapevine, olive trees, and mulberry tree, respectively. In the sixteenth century, the population growth brought along an expansion of areas of irrigation, this time private property. There was also a growth in cereal production. A proof of that is that there used to be a flour mill in the fifteenth century and by the end of the sixteenth century there were seven of them.\n\nFinally, it is important to point out that after Aledo received its town charter, the council managed a meadow named Buhalaje around the village, while the rest of the area remained the competence of the commanders. However, in the 1520s the Order focused on receiving the earned income and lordly rights, and the council eventually took over the management of the whole territory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)Same topicHistorical Studies of Medieval IberiaFrench-language works237,207