Étude exploratoire sur les expériences de santé et de soin d'adolescentes immigrantes de la ville de Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude qualitative exploratoire d'inspiration phénoménologique vise à décrire et à mieux comprendre les expériences de santé et de soin d'adolescentes immigrantes de la ville de Québec. Sept entrevues individuelles semi-structurées ont permis de recueillir les données reflétant la dimension continue et transformationnelle de l'expérience migratoire. Trois tendances émergent de l'analyse guidée par la théorie de la diversité et de l'universalité du soin culturel de Madeleine Leininger (2006), et s'énoncent comme suit : 1) le processus migratoire : d'une quête d'une vie meilleure à une intégration difficile, 2) le milieu scolaire et la famille : des enracinements dans la vie des adolescentes, et 3) les pratiques de santé et de soin : entre diversité et universalité. Manifestement, cette étude souligne la nécessité pour les infirmières de considérer davantage l'holisme et la complexité du contexte singulier de ces adolescentes immigrantes en développement
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".