Equivariant Minimal Surfaces in Complex Hyperbolic Spaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An equivariant minimal surface in $n$-dimensional complex hyperbolic space $\CH{n}$ is a triple consisting of a minimal immersion (possibly branched) of the Poincar\'e disc into $\CH{n}$ and two representations of the fundamental group of a closed oriented surface: one a Fuchsian representation into the isometry group of the disc, and the other a reductive representation into the isometry group of $\CH{n}$. We require the minimal immersion to be equivariant with respect to these two representations. We see how such surfaces have both a corresponding Higgs bundle and a harmonic sequence via the non-abelian Hodge correspondence. This provides an original application of global harmonic sequence theory. In order to do this, we adapt known results about the moduli space of Higgs bundles, develop both the local and global theory for $\CH{n}$ harmonic sequences and apply the latter to the former in a new context. We consider the critical submanifolds fixed under the $\bb{C}^*$-action of the Higgs field. By considering their invariants, we fully classify these subspaces of Hodge bundles, and make clear links back to other geometric measures such as curvature. We also establish necessary conditions for stability of these as Higgs bundles. Finally, we see how the rest of the moduli space can be understood in terms of a Hodge bundle and an extension, before linking this back to invariants from harmonic sequences. We consider the limits of the $\bb{C}^*$-action, describing some explicitly. Applying the concept of the isotropy order from harmonic sequences to Higgs bundles, we end by examining the existence of a Higgs bundle of a given isotropy order. The main results prove the existence of $\CH{3}$ Higgs bundles of all possible isotropy order and then allow us to find topological conditions for the existence of $\CH{n}$ Higgs bundles of a given isotropy order under certain assumptions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".