MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991042526

Feature Story: Big Brown Bat release a huge success

2015· other· en· W6991042526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessFeature (linguistics)Big dataCitizen science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The big brown bat release attracted a huge crowd at the Saskatchewan Science Centre and Dr. Mark Brigham, some of his graduate students from the U of R and the Science Center staff who looked after the bats were at the centre of it all. It’s estimated up to 400 people showed up to witness the release of eight bats May 1. The crowd, most of them young children, cheered with the release of each bat as we show you here. “It’s wonderful to see so many people take such a big interest in this. We were expecting 40 to 50 people but it turned out to be quite the crowd,” says Dr. Brigham who is a professor in the Department of Biology and a well known bat researcher.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0060.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)French-language works237,207