MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991068980

"The Exhibition of the Colonial Gaze": Deconstructing Colonial Legacies in the Museum

2025· other· en· W6991068980 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSkemman · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismExhibitionTemporalityPower (physics)PoliticsCritical discourse analysisCritical theoryHybridityPossession (linguistics)Marxist philosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The legacy of the anthropological museum has been entrenched in violent histories rife with domination, civilizing strategies, and power imbalance. The institutions that remain preserve their vestiges alongside an inheritance of privilege, existing as long withstanding monuments of genocide. The employed theoretical framework of this thesis is fundamentally interpretivist, poststructuralist, and critical in theory, with consideration to Affect Theory, phenomenology, Marxist ideology, and Foucauldian power structures, alongside minor influence of structural functionalism. This thesis explores the colonial legacies of museums, museology, and the affective attachments of museum objects through research into the violence of silence, the politics of memory, and the social practices of temporality and spatiality. These concepts, although diverse, are inseparable when considering the circumstances of museums and will be contextualized by primary research interpreted through the qualitative research method of Critical Discourse Analysis. The analytical framework of the primary research is therefore based on critical inquiry and will address the systemic power imbalance within museums. This will include critical inquiry into Canadian colonial settler history and the implications it has on modern museum ideology, the presentation and provenance of the ceremonial Kwakwaka’wakw bumblebee masks that are in the possession of the University of British Columbia’s Museum of Anthropology, the institutional governance associated with the masks parallel colonial history, observations of the collaborative installation featuring contemporary artist Marianne Nicolson, and Critical Discourse Analysis of various publications and interviews regarding the masks. This research illustrates the Museum of Anthropology’s applications of coercive governmentality, the intrinsic colonial rhetoric that influences social discourse, and the problematic historical implications of obtaining and maintaining possession of the masks which will correspond to the theoretical engagement in the rest of the thesis. Museums pose a social problem for modern, united, circumstances of collective existence and establishing a solution for the future might be found through delegitimizing the institution and submitting the museum to undergo its own iconoclasm. This thesis ultimately postulates that separating museums from their colonial legacies is impossible, rendering decolonization efforts insufficient, thereby concluding that the monument of the museum should not remain on the Western cultural landscape when it is inherently connected to its colonial legacies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSkemmanFrench-language works237,207