Bibliographic record
Abstract
Providence College Department of Theatre, Dance & Film Angell Blackfriars Theatre Fefu and Her Friends Written by María Irene Fornés January 20-23, 2022 Thursday, Friday, Saturday 7:30 PM Sunday 2:00 PM Erin Joy Schmidt............Director Jill Forrester...................Stage Manager Laurel Franczek, Joey Pekar, Carrie Selwood.........Assistant Stage Managers Renee Suprenant-Fitzgerald.................Set Design Michael Clark Wonson.................Lighting Design David Cabral.....................Costume Design Sam Sewell..................Sound Design Rachel Padula-Schufelt...................Wig Design James T. Beauregard................Violence Coordinator Steven Doucette................Prop Master Patricia Tulli-Hawkridge................Vocal Coach Maxine Wheelock................Costume Shop Supervisor Trevor Elliot................Technical Director Gabe Luxton................Assistant Technical Director Jimmy Calitri................Managing Director Allison Crews................Production Office Coordinator The Cast Cindy-Sydney Cahill, Christina-Victoria Cannon, Fefu-Kelsi Canada, Paula-Analisa Pisano, Emma-Madelyn Rich, Sue-Christina Schwab, Cecilia-Kelly Slader, Julia-Katie Vennard A signature work of feminist theatre by a giant of the avant-garde. Set in the 1930s, a group of eight women gather at the country home of their brilliant and eccentric friend, Fefu. As multiple conflicts unfold between the old friends, the women struggle to define who they are and what it means to be a woman in a patriarchal society. Though written in the 1970s, FEFU AND HER FRIENDS raises questions and anxieties around gender and identity that endure today. María Irene Fornés has been called the greatest and least-known dramatist of our time. Signature Theatre devoted its 1999–2000 season to her work. She’s written over 40 “spare, poetic, and emotionally forceful works”; won nine OBIE awards; and her epic What of the Night? was a finalist for the 1990 Pulitzer Prize. JoAnne Akalaitis, Edward Albee Caryl Churchill, Migdalia Cruz, John Guare, Tony Kushner, Eduardo Machado, Caridad Svich, Paula Vogel are among the artists that have credited her as an inspiration and influence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.519 | 0.224 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".