MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991121652

Field, textural, and geochronological investigations into the intrusion dynamics and crystallization histories of the Separation Rapids rare-metal pegmatites, northwestern Ontario

2024· dissertation· en· W6991121652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPegmatiteOverprintingMetamorphismMonaziteSupercontinentIntrusion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Separation Lake greenstone belt (SLgb) is host to a suite of potentially economic Neoarchean Lithium – Cesium – Tantalum (LCT) complex type, petalite subtype granitic pegmatites (Big Whopper, Big Mack, Snowbank, Glitter and Marko’s). Field observations on these pegmatites such as well-developed layering, ptygmatic folds, boudins, and mullions have in the past led investigators to infer that the pegmatites experienced pervasive high-strain deformation after emplacement. In this study, we reinterpret the field relations between the pegmatites and country rock, incorporate pegmatite microtextures, and date, by the U-Pb method, the time of crystallization to reassess the role of regional-scale deformation in the distribution and morphology of these pegmatites. Uranium-Pb ratios in monazite and titanite were measured, in-situ, by LA-ICP-MS to establish the timing of regional metamorphism and pegmatite intrusion. Monazite in the country rock yields the same age, within error, of the ca. 2650 Ma Separation Rapids pluton and suggests intrusion and metamorphism were coeval in the area. The range of monazite U-Pb ages of ca. 2637 Ma, ca. 2617 Ma, and ca. 2602 Ma indicate that the pegmatites crystallized after metamorphism / deformation and may not be related to one magmatic event. Field relationships and microtextural data indicate that deformation is induced locally (i.e., not regional) and results from emplacement mechanisms during pegmatite intrusion. The dominant fabric in the country rock is defined by the alignment of hornblende and is cut by the pegmatite. Moreover, all pegmatites have a metasomatic halo of biotite that overprints the S2 fabric in the country rock. Essentially, the pegmatites acted as viscous indenters into fluidized, weakened, ductile country rock. Recognizing the fact that deformation is not a result of regional-scale deformation has important implications for exploration including: 1) pegmatites need not intrude along structural corridors, 2) the dominant direction of propagation is now oriented subvertical with the surface expression of several pegmatites suggesting the bulk of the intrusions lies buried under the current erosional surface; and 3) undiscovered LCT pegmatites may lie within other segments of metavolcanic rocks along the English River – Winnipeg River subprovincial boundary, as similar emplacement ages across the SLgb and Bird River belt of eastern Manitoba (e.g. Big Mack at ca. 2637 Ma and Tanco at ca. 2640 Ma) may infer continuous mineralization along the boundary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→