Exploraciones arqueológicas en la Catedral Metropolitana de Panamá / Archaeological explorations in the Metropolitan Cathedral of Panama
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tras la destrucción de Panamá Viejo en 1671, la población fue trasladada a lo que se conoce como el Casco Antiguo o San Felipe, fundado dos años más tarde, en 1673. Este nuevo emplazamiento es, actualmente, el centro histórico de la Ciudad de Panamá, el cual fue declarado Patrimonio Mundial en 1997 (Figura 1). Uno de los inmuebles emblemáticos del Casco Antiguo es la Catedral Metropolitana, ubicada en la plaza principal de la antigua ciudad. En el año 2010 se dio inicio a un proyecto de evaluación y diagnóstico del estado actual del templo, el cual incluyó una exploración arqueológica con objetivos acotados, relacionados con interrogantes estructurales del inmueble. Este trabajo ofrece los resultados de tales exploraciones, precisando la estrategia metodológica utilizada y generando una serie de hipótesis y recomendaciones que serán de utilidad al futuro proyecto de intervención y restauración del templo. /Following the destruction of Panamá Viejo in 1671, the population was moved to what is now known as the Old Quarter or San Felipe, founded two years later in 1673. This new settlement is nowadays the historic center of Panamá City, declared a World Heritage Site in 1997 (Figure 1). One of the most emblematic buildings in the Old Quarter is the Metropolitan Cathedral, located on the main plaza of the old town. In 2010 a project for the evaluation and diagnostic of the temple´s conservation state was undertaken, which included an archaeological exploration of the building with precise purposes, related to structural issues. This essay offers the results of these investigations, detailing the method used and generating a series of hypothesis and recommendations that will be of use to the future intervention and restoration project of the temple.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".