MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991134130

Familiar Microcompany and empreendedorismo in the quarter Are Peter in Teresina-PI

2008· article· en· W6991134130 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFamily Business Performance and Succession
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)GlobalizationFeelingFamily businessState (computer science)Market researchEntrepreneurship
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of globalization brings with it the competitiveness as one of the main features of market economies. Feeling that the development of entrepreneurial skills, more than ever becomes a constant need within the business. With regard to the characteristics micro entrepreneurs are proving as an important tool to gain in competitiveness, so for his stay in market. Starting from this scenario of the market as they aim of this study assess the presence of the characteristics of entrepreneurs\nin micro family neighborhood of SÃo Pedro in municipality of Teresina in state of Piaui. The study makes a brief review of theories on the family business and, its relationship with entrepreneurship, and based their analysis on the theory of behavior entrepreneur, of David McClalland (1987), as well as in literature found. The type of research is exploratory, empirical, and descriptive. The information was obtained by direct search. The universe of search was constituted by 109 micro of the neighborhood SÃo Pedro in Teresina, PiauÃ, identified by the survey conducted by us. Conclude that all the companies surveyed with more than 5 years existence, the theory of behavior enterprise of McClalland, demonstrating the validity of variables indicator of entrepreneurial behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)Same topicFamily Business Performance and SuccessionFrench-language works237,207