MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991179414

Field trials of a lifeboat in ice and open water conditions

2011· article· en· W6991179414 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicShip Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen waterPropulsionSubmarine pipelineArcticRange (aeronautics)Sea iceField (mathematics)Sea trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evacuation from offshore petroleum installations and marine vessels in Arctic and sub-Arctic regions must function in environmental conditions that include cold temperatures, remote locations, and a range of open water and sea ice cover. Field trials with a conventional lifeboat were carried out over the last four years to investigate the extent to which ice limits operational capabilities. The lifeboat was outfitted as a research platform. Measurements were made of ice loads in different types of ice conditions and in different types of operations. Changes in propulsion performance were investigated in light of major modifications to the propulsion system. Propulsion was also evaluated in open water to provide performance benchmarks. The field trials are described and some results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicShip Hydrodynamics and ManeuverabilityFrench-language works237,207