Flying Disc Parasport Wheelchair Ultimate (Book 1)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We at WFDF are honored to introduce to the eBook “Flying Disc Parasport Wheelchair Ultimate - BOOK 1” written by José Amoroso, which is being introduced as an important resource to promote the adaptive disciplines in our sport to our global audience of more than 100 National Federations. Initial discussions on the topic of the introduction of Wheelchair Ultimate as a Flying Disc sport under the WFDF umbrella emerged during the 2013 WFDF Congress and it was broadly agreed that WFDF should support the development of Wheelchair Ultimate competitions globally. The WFDF Board of Directors approved moving ahead, adding the disabled sport section of the Flying Disc sports Ultimate (Wheelchair) and Disc Golf to the event portfolio. WFDF had obtained positive reactions from major WFDF member countries such as Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chinese Taipei, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hong Kong China, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, Portugal, South Africa, Switzerland, and USA, when checking on Parasports activities and interest to develop national adaptive programs. In the following period in 2014/15 after the recognition granted by the IPC in October 2014, WFDF collected further contacts from Wheelchair Ultimate groups and worked with them on gaining practical expertise on how Wheelchair Ultimate should be structured as a sport. The Action Plan based on this valuable input created for two-year periods starting in 2014 has resulted in improvements on the outreach program, the discussion with the fellow IFs like IWBF Wheelchair Basketball, IWRF Wheelchair Rugby, and IWAS Wheelchair Fencing to learn on the operations of crucial competition rules, classification and accessibility check of venues. The participation of WFDF in the IPC Observer Programme at the Rio 2016 and Pyeongchang 2018 Paralympic Games were milestones in the understanding of requirements of adapted sports on highest competition level. The present ebook is the next step in our process and establishes the first set of competition rules including the guidelines on venue layouts for Wheelchair Ultimate. And will greatly contribute to staging continental competitions in Wheelchair Ultimate in Europe, America, Asia/Oceania within the next working period. This will eventually lead to World Championships in the next 2-3 years. We thank our partners at the International Paralympic Committee (IPC), International Wheelchair and Amputee Sport Federation (IWAS), and our scientific partners for their contribution. Our great thanks and appreciation go to the editor of the “Flying Disc Parasport Wheelchair Ultimate - BOOK 1” José Amoroso from Portugal who worked tirelessly on the project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.268 | 0.100 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".