Francesco Laparelli: the fortification of Cortona and his entry into the Medici entourage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il contributo ricostruisce le vicende dell’ammodernamento delle mura etrusco-medievali di Cortona promosso da Cosimo I nel secondo quarto del XVI secolo. Nei lavori ebbero un ruolo fondamentale Gabrio Serbelloni e Francesco Laparelli. \nI risultati della ricerca evidenziano due differenti approcci tesi a migliorare la difesa dell’intero circuito delle mura cittadine. Uno consiste nella costruzione di bastioni, l’altro nel trasformare le mura preesistenti in terrazzamenti per creare piazze d’armi. \nThe contribution reconstructs the events of the modernization of Cortona's Etruscan-medieval walls promoted by Cosimo I in the second quarter of the 16th century. Gabrio Serbelloni and Francesco Laparelli played a fundamental role in the works. \nThe research results highlight two different approaches aimed at improving the defense of the entire urban walls. One is to build bastions, and the other is to transform the existing town walls into retaining walls to create places of arms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".