MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991231377

Fatigue Tests and Design of Thin Cold-Formed Square Hollow Section-to-Plate T-Connections under In-Plane Bending

2002· article· en· W6991231377 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeldingSquare (algebra)BendingStress (linguistics)TruckFatigue testing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin-walled tubular sections (t<4 mm) are increasingly being used in the road transportation industry and agricultural industry for applications such as lighting poles, traffic sign supports, truck trailers, swing-ploughs, haymakers, and linkage graders. These structures are subjected to fatigue loading and some failures have been observed. Both the International Institute of Welding and International Committee for the Development and Study of Tubular Construction fatigue guides for welded tubular joints apply only to tubes with a thickness above 4 mm. This paper deals with the fatigue design of tube-to-plate T joints under cyclic in-plane bending using the classification method. Forty-eight specimens, made up by welding a square hollow section tube (t<4 mm) to a plate, are fatigue tested. The effects of in-line galvanizing, steel grade, stress ratio, and tube wall thickness on the fatigue life of these joints are investigate. The design stress range-to-number of cycles (S-N) curves, derived from the least squares method of analysis, show that the S-N curves for the tube-to-plate joints lie above the existing S-N curves in the Australian, European, and Canadian standards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207