MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991236166

Funciones relajadas resumen informativo: Exploración de la accesibilidad en el panorama teatral canadiense

2020· report· es· W6991236166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2020
Typereport
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicHistorical and Modern Theater Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)VisibilityTheme (computing)Panorama
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este folleto resume los hallazgos de una investigación
\ncofinanciada por el British Council, Canadá y Bodies in
\nTranslation: Activist Art, Technology and Access to Life, un
\nproyecto de investigación de la Universidad de Guelph en
\nOntario, Canadá. Para su elaboración, relacionamos los
\nhallazgos del informe con el arte y la legislación en el ámbito
\nde la discapacidad —como la Ley de Accesibilidad para
\nOntarianos con Discapacidad (AODA, por sus siglas
\nen inglés) o la Ley Canadá Accesible (Bill C-81)—. Este
\nfolleto recoge información de entrevistas, encuestas y
\nanálisis de espacios teatrales con el objeto de comprender
\nlos ejemplos existentes de Funciones Relajadas, así como de
\nexplorar tanto las experiencias como el impacto de
\nsu enseñanza.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesFrench-language works237,207