MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991340019

GENDER AND SES EFFECTS ON MULTIDIMENSIONAL SELF-CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT DURING ADOLESCENCE

2013· dissertation· en· W6991340019 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Traits and Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusLongitudinal studyRedressLongitudinal dataPerceptionMarital statusMeasure (data warehouse)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study constitutes an integral part of the Dublin Child Development Study, a longitudinal study which began in 1986 and which has had eight waves of data collection since its inception. Using data collected during two of these waves, multidimensional self-concept status of 72 participants (F = 40, M = 32) was examined at 10 (T1) and 17 (T2) years of age. Longitudinal changes in multidimensional self-concept between T1 and T2 were also examined. The Shavelson Hubner and Stanton Structural Model (1976) was used as the theoretical basis for this research; this model emphasises the multidimensionality of the self-concept construct. The Piers-Harris 2 measure used was consistent with the multidimensional conceptualisation. The study also examined the influences of gender. The rationale for examining gender differences in multidimensional self-concept status and change over time was to redress the weaknesses of earlier research alluded to by Wiley (1979), Marsh (1990) and Crain (1996). Apart from a Canadian study by Shapka and Keating (2005), which used the Harter Self Perception Profile as its measure of self-concept, no previous research has included both age and gender in the one study. The influence of maternal socioeconomic status (SES) on self-concept at T1 and T2 was also examined. With regard to the effects of gender, an interesting pattern of findings emerged. Of the seven self-concept variables examined at T1, females scored higher than males on six of the seven sub-domains, with gender differences reaching or approaching significance on four of the self-concept variables. The pattern was somewhat reversed at T2 where males scored higher than females on five of the sub-domains with significant or nearly significant gender differences being found for four of these. Further interesting patterns emerged when gender differences in self-concept change between T1 and T2 were examined. For females, Total SC, Freedom from Anxiety and Happiness and Satisfaction self-concepts decreased significantly between 10 and 17 years of age whereas for the males, Total Self-concept, Physical Appearance and Attributes and Popularity self-concepts increased significantly during the same period of time. Analyses of SES effects at T1 found a main effect of SES on Physical Appearance and Attributes with 10-year-olds from a lower/working-class background having higher self-perceptions on this domain than their middle/upper middle-class peers. By 17 years of age (T2) any SES differences had dissipated. The implications of these findings are discussed and recommendations are made with regard to further research and some possible intervention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin)Same topicPersonality Traits and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207