MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6991347983

Freedon Concepts Drive Mode Mechanism

2018· report· en· W6991347983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2018
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanism (biology)SprocketSet (abstract data type)Mode (computer interface)Mechanism designDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Ratchet
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report marks the completion of phase one (design) of the Drive Mode Mechanism project submitted by Freedom Concepts Inc. for the MECH 4860 –Engineering Design course at the University of Manitoba. The second phase (prototype) will begin in January 2019and will be completed in April 2019. Freedom Concepts Inc. is a Winnipeg based company that designs and manufactures adaptive tricycles and mobility devices for people living with disabilities. The company has tasked the student design team with the development of a tool-free mechanism to accomplish two separate drive modes for the rider (freewheel and direct drive) and that is compatible with all current tricycle models. The current mechanism being used on the tricycles relies on frictional contact between four set screws and a standard freewheel sprocket to toggle between the two modes. Although functional, actuation requires the use of a tool and has proven too cumbersome for the average caregiver. The design team conceptualized a two-way ratchet mechanism capable of supporting a freewheel and direct drive mode with a single switch actuation. This concept was developed through research, concept development, and feedback from the client and the course advisor. The mechanism consists almost entirely of laser cut sheet metal and off-the-shelf components from McMaster-Carr® to reduce low-volume production costs and facilitate design changes in the prototyping phase. The estimated cost of the prototype design is$133.99.Tomeet the requirements set by the client, the design features two spring loaded pawls, one of which can be rotated away or toward an internal gear profile using a switch to support the freewheel or direct drive modes. The sprocket can be easily interchanged with any of the 18, 22 or 26-tooth variations to deliver all three pedaling difficulties that a customer may order. To maximize the lifespan of the device, the design is supported by a full stainless-steel construction, sealed bearings and maintenance plan. Included with the final design is a detailed installation procedure, bill of materials, cost breakdown, preliminary failure modes and effects analysis, and a complete package of preliminary drawings including all three custom sprocket sizes. These deliverables fulfill all requirements of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1370.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→French-language works237,207→