MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991354600

Georg Naumann: Naturforscher, Pionier der Erdgaserkundung in Kanada, Partner von Max Hinsche in Kanada

2016· other· de· W6991354600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) · 2016
Typeother
Languagede
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMining industryPoliticsStatistical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Georg Naumann (1901 Radeberg-1978 Upper Wells/ Kanada). Bekannt und berühmt wurde Georg Naumann, der gemeinsam als Partner von Max Hinsche mit ihm nach Kanada ging, als Trapper und Pionier bei der frühen lokalen Auffindung und Nutzung der kanadischen Öl- und Erdgasvorkommen im nördlichen Einzugsgebiet des Athabasca River in der Prärieprovinz Alberta. Zunehmend wurde er zum Naturwissenschaftler, der in den bisher unerschlossenen Gebieten am Athabasca River die Öl- und Erdgasvorkommen des Sandes nutzte und bewusst einsetzte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2660.103

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden)Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207