MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991359183

Gestion des conflits dans les équipes de travail multiculturelles

2025· other· fr· W6991359183 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSémaphore (Université du Québec à Rimouski) · 2025
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismWork (physics)Qualitative researchDiversity (politics)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ : Cette recherche vise à comprendre l'impact de la diversité multiculturelle sur les processus de coopération et de résolution des conflits au sein des équipes de travail, un aspect essentiel pour la réussite des équipes et l'efficacité organisationnelle. L'étude s’appuie sur les expériences personnelles du praticien-chercheur dans des contextes multiculturels distincts (Guinée, Turquie, Allemagne et Québec) et utilise une méthodologie qualitative d’autopraxéographie qui permet de documenter et de réfléchir sur les situations vécues, en analysant les sources de tensions et en identifiant les mécanismes de résolution de celles-ci dans chaque contexte. Les résultats révèlent diverses sources de tensions dues aux différences culturelles, ainsi que des solutions de gestion favorisant un climat de travail inclusif et performant. Cette recherche met en lumière l'importance d'une approche de gestion des conflits qui valorise la diversité culturelle et propose des recommandations pour les leaders souhaitant renforcer la coopération et la performance au sein d'équipes de travail multiculturelles. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en français : Conflit, gestion des conflits, équipe, équipe multiculturelle, interculturalité et multiculturalité. -- ABSTRACT : This research aims to understand the impact of multicultural diversity on cooperation and conflict resolution processes within work teams, an essential aspect for team success and organizational effectiveness. The study draws on the personal experiences of the practitioner-researcher in distinct multicultural contexts (Guinea, Turkey, Germany and Quebec) and uses a qualitative methodology of autopraxeography that allows to document and reflect on the situations experienced, analyzing the sources of tensions and identifying the mechanisms for resolving them in each context. The results reveal various sources of tensions due to cultural differences, as well as management solutions that promote an inclusive and efficient work climate. This research highlights the importance of a conflict management approach that values cultural diversity and offers recommendations for leaders wishing to strengthen cooperation and performance within multicultural work teams. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en anglais : Conflict, conflict management, team, multicultural team, interculturality, multiculturalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSémaphore (Université du Québec à Rimouski)French-language works237,207