MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991412851

Gens, maisnie, ou hôtel ? Le personnel à gages à la cour de Guillaume I/III de Hainaut et Hollande/Zélande et de son épouse Jeanne de Valois (1304-1337)

2012· article· fr· W6991412851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)Quarter (Canadian coin)Job loss
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette contribution tente d'appréhender, à l'aide de sept documents comptables provenant des archives des comtes de Hainaut et de Hollande entre 1304 et 1337, la pratique du service à gages à la cour et dans l'hôtel comtal. Une analyse des termes utilisés dans ces documents pour désigner ces services et les personnes rémunérées permet de brosser un tableau de l'organisation de la maisnie comtale. Contrairement à ce que des textes normatifs, telles les ordonnances de cour, nous montrent, ces services ne sont pas structurés de façon rigide selon un schéma bien défini. Ils sont plutôt (dés)organisés de façon pragmatique selon les besoins journaliers changeants d'une famille comtale ambulante et souvent séparée, les moyens financiers du moment et la disponibilité des personnes concernées par les différents services. Sur une période d'environ 25 années, ces instantanés nous montrent un personnel de niveaux très divers, multi-disponible et flexible, fidèle et apprécié par ses employeurs mais souvent aussi actif dans d'autres secteurs que le service comtal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)Same topicMedieval and Early Modern JusticeFrench-language works237,207