MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6991422897

The geology and geochemistry of the Millennium uranium deposit, Athabasca basin, Saskatchewan, Canada

2010· dissertation· en· W6991422897 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUraniniteUraniumUranium oreMineralization (soil science)Sedimentary depositional environmentRadiometric dating
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Millennium uranium deposit is located 35 km north of the Key Lake mine, Saskatchewan. Uranium mineralization occurs in a variety of styles including (1) massive replacement, (2) fracture filling veins, (3) fine-grain aggregates associated with “mini” roll fronts, and (4) disseminated grains. The chemical Pb and isotopic 207Pb/206Pb ages of the massive (style 1), vein-type (style 2), and fine-aggregate (style 3) uraninite cluster at 1400-1200 and 1100-900 Ma. The ~1400 Ma ages coincide with the primary mineralization event for many of the uranium deposits (1550-1400 Ma) within the Athabasca Basin. Unlike other uranium deposits from the Athabasca basin, disseminated uraninite (style 4) have 207Pb/206Pb ages from 1770-1650 Ma. These ages are older than the depositional age for the Athabasca sediments (~1710 Ma) and are similar to the ages from the Beaverlodge vein-type uranium deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207