“Handbook” Instant Architecture. Scale 1:1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A lo largo de los últimos años, durante las distintas ediciones del Mes Cultural, nos han visitado un importante número de organizadores de Talleres de Arquitectura desde 2014 hasta 2018. En este momento ya contamos con experiencias memorables y, sin duda alguna, todo este esfuerzo merece ser potenciado en un TFG / INSTANT ARCHITECTURE E1:1. INSTANT ARCHITECTURE E1:1 significa que la arquitectura se puede convertir en un papel muy importante para construcciones instantáneas y por tanto perecederas. Estas construcciones tienen el potencial de ser a escala real, 1:1. - 2014. PNEUMATIC SERENDIPITY / Prada Poole (Madrid). - 2015. ARQUITECTURAS DE LUZ / Manuel Báez (Ottawa). - 2016. EL SONIDO DE LA ARQUITECTURA / Santiago Pérez (Perth). - 2017. TEJIENDO ESPACIOS / Steinunn Sigurðardóttir (Reikiavik). - 2018. LA TRAMA DEL CIELO / Sergio Pone (Nápoles).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".